
Categories
- Architecture (42)
- Awards (6)
- Behind the Build (9)
- Construction (36)
- Insights (62)
- Projects (15)
About Author
Dave MilamTags
Let’s talk about money.
If there’s one thing that derails more church building design projects than anything else, it’s a broken approach to budgeting. We’ve seen churches hit pause, scrap plans, or start over—not because they lacked vision, but because they made a few avoidable mistakes on the financial side.
In this post, we’ll unpack two of the most common financial missteps we see churches make—and how to avoid them—so your project doesn’t hit a budget wall before it ever breaks ground.
Budget first. Draw second.
Let’s be honest—we all shop like this: You’re scrolling Instagram and spot something you like. Maybe it’s the Ninja SLUSHi™ Professional Frozen Drink Maker. You like smoothies. You like ninjas. Naturally, you think, How much does that thing cost?
You check Amazon. $298. Decision made: pass.
The American decision model is simple: See it → Price it → Decide.
It works fine for kitchen gadgets. But for church building design projects? That sequence leads to sticker shock and redesign.
We often hear churches say, “Let’s just design it and see what it costs.” Every time—without exception—that approach leads to disappointment and redesign. Your church builder can deliver something breathtaking and award-worthy… but without budget constraints, it likely won’t be affordable. We’ve seen beautiful $40 million renderings shelved because the budget conversation came too late.
A better strategy? Think like you’re at an auction.
You see something you love. Before the bidding starts, you define your ceiling. You decide your limit. That way, when emotions rise, you know when to stop.
Before your architect opens their sketchbook, you need to know your number. Budget first. Draw second.
So obviously, this begs the question: how do you figure out your total church building project budget? We’ve found it comes from four primary funding buckets:
You may have a building fund—money that’s been faithfully set aside for years. Or perhaps your church has been saving quietly behind the scenes. Whatever you’re ready to commit to the project now goes in this bucket.
The rule of thumb:
So if your church’s annual giving is $1M, a consultant-led campaign might bring in $1.5M–$2M.
Most lenders approve total debt up to 3x annual giving. Some will stretch to 4x, but that’s where the caution lights flash. 5x is rare and risky unless your church has exceptional stability and support.
This includes anything you can sell to fund the project: property, vehicles, crypto, or other major assets. Many churches count on selling land to close a funding gap—but timing a sale to align with construction can be tough.
When you’re asking, “What can we afford?”—these four categories define the answer. Add them up, and you’ve got your total project budget. That number isn’t a target or a dream—it’s your ceiling.
Set it early. Set it honestly. And don’t fall in love with a rendering outside your reach. Budget first. Draw second. That’s how you build with wisdom.
Here’s what we’ve learned:
Unpriced plans almost always lead to overpriced regrets.
Architects will draw what you ask for—and they’ll do it well. But if there’s no budget feedback during design, you’re not building. You’re just dreaming.
At Visioneering Studios, we use a Design+Build model that includes three built-in budget checkpoints before we ever reach a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP). These checkpoints are crucial opportunities to value-engineer and adjust scope—long before costly surprises show up.
And this brings us to one of the most overlooked—but most important—decisions in any church building design project: Choosing your construction delivery method.
It sounds technical, but this decision shapes your timeline, your costs, your risk, and how much time your staff will spend managing the process.
Here are the three most common methods churches use:
This is the most traditional—and most outdated—method.
You fully design the project with an architect. Then, you send it to several contractors for sealed bids. The bids come back as a single lump-sum number. No breakdowns. No transparency. That’s when you find out what your church building project actually costs. If the bids are too high (which is common), you pay the architect to revise the plans, then rebid. It’s a cycle of redraws, delays, and disappointment.
This is our recommended method—for a reason.
Your church hires one team to handle both design and construction. A clear budget is set early, and it’s validated at every design checkpoint. Scope is adjusted in real time to stay aligned with the numbers. Subcontractors are competitively and transparently bid out. You end with a Guaranteed Maximum Price, not a guessing game. And with true Design+Build, you sign one contract with one team—which reduces your risk dramatically.One team. One contract. One accountable partner.
But watch out—some firms claim to be “Design+Build” but still require you to sign separate contracts with the architect and builder. That’s not real Design+Build. It’s just a label.
IPD looks similar to Design+Build but with one major difference: You, the client, sign separate contracts with the architect and the builder.
That means you’re in the middle—managing communication, resolving conflicts, and absorbing risk. It can work, but it places more burden on church leadership to keep everyone aligned.
Here’s the bottom line:
Your construction delivery method will determine how early and how often your project is grounded in budget reality.
If you wait until the drawings are done to ask what it costs, you’ve waited too long.
Choose a method that builds cost into the process from day one. That’s the difference between dreaming and actually building.
Explore the last costly mistakes churches make during the design and construction process:
Mistake 7: The Soft Cost Trap that Blows Up Budgets »
Missed the earlier post in this series?
🔙 Mistakes #2–4 — Team Hazards That Can Derail Your Church Building Design Project Before It Begins